Find the searches your competitors are winning.
CompeteDesk shows what buyers search for, how hard each search is to win, and what AI tools recommend when buyers ask. You see where you appear, where you lose the shortlist, which sources shape the answer, and what to fix first.
Toolbound lost six of 12 buyer questions. This one had the clearest evidence.
| Surface | What buyers see | You |
|---|---|---|
| MakerKit review visible at #5 | absent | |
| AI Overview | No overview shown | no answer |
| ChatGPT | MakerKit, ShipFast, Supastarter named | absent |
| Perplexity | MakerKit, Supastarter named | absent |
Separate internal Toolbound check shown here. Read the latest dated FleetKeep sample report.
Four steps from buyer question to a fix you can ship.
One fixed sprint. We map the questions, run them across every surface, and hand back the losses with cited proof and one change to make.
Intake
Your company, competitors, buyer and deal context.
Questions
The searches and AI prompts buyers use before they book a call.
Evidence
Google and AI answers, repeat checks on promising losses, and verification of the cited pages behind them.
Output
Buyer loss cards, one prioritised fix, a matching agent brief and a clear retest condition.
A short, cited pack you can act on the same week.
One deliverable you can read in ten minutes. It shows where you lose, who wins instead, where the source came from, and whether the search is worth chasing.
- 12 buyer questionsThe high-intent searches buyers use before they shortlist vendors, with repeat checks on the strongest apparent losses.
- 4 discovery surfacesGoogle, Google AI Overview, ChatGPT and Perplexity.
- Search demand and difficultyGoogle volume, CPC and ranking difficulty for the buyer searches worth chasing.
- Verified source mapWhether the cited page supports the named rival, what type of source it is, and whether its authority clears the report bar.
- Up to 3 buyer loss cardsWhere competitors appear instead, each with cited proof. We do not pad the report when fewer losses clear review.
- Citation targetsThe third-party pages most worth influencing first.
- One aligned fixThe report recommendation and copyable agent brief point to the same buyer search, source target and retest.
Know which lost searches are worth fixing first.
A shortlist loss only matters if buyers search for it. The paid report adds Google volume, CPC and ranking difficulty beside the lost questions, so the fix brief can prioritise the page with the best chance of commercial return.
- Monthly searchesWhich buyer questions have visible Google demand.
- Ranking difficultyHow hard the organic win is likely to be.
- CPC signalWhether advertisers already treat the query as commercially valuable.
- Optional GSC contextIf you share Search Console data, we can compare impressions and clicks against the same buyer questions.
Two common reasons teams run the check.
- ChatGPT competitor visibilitySee whether ChatGPT names rivals before you on category, alternative, review and comparison questions.
- AI search audit for SaaSRun a fixed-scope audit across Google, AI Overview, ChatGPT and Perplexity, with source proof and one fix brief.
The report shows why a loss matters and what to test next.
On “MakerKit reviews”, three rivals appeared and Toolbound did not.
MakerKit reviews had measurable demand and repeated agreement across the returned AI answers.
Publish review evidence buyers and answer engines can cite.
Show who uses Toolbound, what they value, what it costs and where it fits beside MakerKit.
Where the sprint pays off, and where it will not.
Good fit
- Live B2B or vertical software product
- Three to eight named competitors
- Buyers compare online before they call sales
- A typical qualified deal is worth more than the £295 sprint
- Someone who can change the site or positioning
Poor fit
- Pre-launch product with no indexed footprint
- Tiny self-serve or consumer apps
- No clear competitors
- Looking for cheap generic SEO tracking
- Nobody able to ship a change
Fixed scope, paid once. Enter your website above and sign in for a free preview, then run the full sprint across Google, AI Overview, ChatGPT and Perplexity for £295. We review the evidence and send the report within one working day. If we cannot produce one that meets our evidence standard, we refund the payment.
The things teams ask before they run a check.
What do I get?
Up to three buyer loss cards when the evidence supports them, a cited source pack, one fix brief and a before-and-after retest. If there are no defensible losses, you receive a visibility baseline. If we cannot produce a report that meets our evidence standard, we refund the payment. See the sample report.
Do you guarantee I will be recommended?
No. The sprint shows where you lose the shortlist and what to consider changing. Movement depends on the fix and the market.
Is this a monthly subscription?
No. It is one fixed sprint, paid once, and nothing renews. It includes one before-and-after retest once your fix is live.
Which surfaces do you test?
The sprint checks Google organic, Google AI Overview, ChatGPT and Perplexity. When a report needs extra review, we can also use Gemini, Claude and Grok. We include the cited pages, reviews and sources behind the answers.